arrow Home arrow Bookmarks & Links Wednesday, 08 February 2012  
Canadian Biogas Association


 
Home
about us
Contacts
Glossary
Library
Bookmarks & Links
- - - - - - -
Sections

Bookmark Detail

Biogas Production Facility on Farms - A 1985 Look At The Recent Experience
report produced by Ralph G. Winfield & Assoc., RR#1, Belmont, Ontario, N0L 1B0
January 1986.


The primary objective of this report is to bring together and evaluate the on-farm experience of anaerobic digester users in Canada.
The second objective is to recomment further research or field experimentation that should be undertaken to enhance or encourage anaerobic digester system designs for, or on Canadian farms. Economic viability must be the ultimate criterion upon' which installation is based.
Bassed on the vists to farms and discussions with operatiof there is no doubt that anaerobic digestion of animal manure does indeed reduce odours. That in itself is a very positive factor in continuing the effort to develop on-farm digester technology. Unfortunately odour control offers no directly measureably financial incentive for an animal producer to spend even 20 to 50 thousand dollars.
If anaerobic digestion is to be an interal part of animal production facilities some other benefit or some other interes group must provide the financial incentive. The on-farm benefits result been percieved to be in two categories: direct energy as a result of effectively using biogas; and savings by refeeding a portion of the digester effluent.
There is no doubt that the construction of a digester unit and separation equipment necessary to recover protein for livestock feed is not feasibly if the major purpose is to recover protein. Evidence appears sufficient to suggest that the obtainable protein supplement will not satisfactorily replace most of the protein in beef, dairy or swine rotations.
Total anaerobic digestion systems including cogeneration and/or recovery facilities can be capital intensive. Most systems visited have been designed for relatively large animal population units. One could cost them on a per animal basis but that cost is not proportional. Researchers, designers and users all agree that scaled down units are neigher practical nor possible (economically) with present designs.
  • Root / Canadian Biogas Projects
0.00 (0 votes)
253
Jul 15, 2005 at 09:26 AM / Jul 27, 2005 at 04:02 PM
Meghan Oram

[ Back ]

Bookmarks v2.6-Final (2005-05-29) © 2005 TEGDesign
Registration & Login
Terms of Use
Username

Password

Remember me
Password Reminder
No account yet? Create one
 
top


Mambo is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.